How Did the Supreme Court Judges Vote on the Sports Betting Ruling?

A Historic Victory

It was a historic day for the sports betting community when the Supreme Court issued their landmark ruling on Thursday, upholding the right of states to legalize sports betting.

The court issued a unanimous decision in the case of Murphy vs. NCAA, affirming the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) and striking down the longstanding federal law that had outlawed sports betting. Although the court left open the question of whether states can go further and legalize wagering on intercollegiate athletic events involving university students, the ruling is a major victory for the billion-dollar industry.

What Does It All Mean?

A significant portion of the court’s opinion deals with the issue of federalism, and how the federal government’s involvement in sports affects the balance of power between the states and the federal government. The court was presented with the opportunity to clarify the parameters of the federal government’s involvement in sports, with many considering the ruling as a significant victory for states’ rights and limited government activism. The court also took the opportunity to denounce football, explaining that the game is too important to the American public to be considered a matter of purely state concern.

What Does it All Mean For Sportsbook Owners?

The ruling means that states now have the power to regulate sports betting, provided that the wagering is restricted to adults and that sportsbooks are licensed and regulated by the government. Since the court upheld PASPA, states can now license and regulate sportsbooks, and individuals can now legally place wagers on sporting events.

Additionally, the court’s decision allows for the possibility of federal anti-trust lawsuits against the major sports leagues, which had prohibited member clubs from entering into contracts with bookmakers based on the grounds that such agreements would violate the ‘‘integrity’’ of the game. The leagues vigorously oppose legalized sports betting, but may have no choice but to comply with federal court orders if they wish to continue playing their beloved game.

In light of the court’s ruling, it is highly likely that many states will decide to legalize, regulate, and tax sports betting, further solidifying it as an essential part of American society.

How Did the Justices Vote?

In a 5-4 decision, the court voted along partisan lines, with the majority of the judges ruling in favor of New Jersey’s ability to regulate sports betting. The court was deeply divided on the issue of ‘‘whether Congress could remove a product that has been a part of American culture for years”, with four of the court’s justices dissenting. While most agree that the case was important for the future of legal sports betting, it is curious that such a deeply divided court could issue a ruling so affirming the majoritarian will.

What Happens Next?

The ruling is a huge victory for the sports betting industry and legalization advocates, but it is certainly not the end of the story. The four dissenting judges argued that the decision essentially “trivializes” the role of the federal government in American life, and that it conflicts with the spirit of the original intention of the Constitution. While the court’s decision effectively struck down PASPA and opened the door to legalized sports betting, it is still unclear what will happen next as various states and the federal government fight for control over this new market. If the recent past is any indication, it seems that states will have the upper hand for the time being.

In the meantime, sportsbooks should prepare for the possibility of being regulated by states and for the increased competition that will likely ensue as a result of the ruling. Additionally, sportsbooks will need to ensure that all of their employees are educated on the requirements and restrictions of gaming in their state, as well as the federal government, to avoid any trouble. While it is unclear how the court’s ruling will affect the future of sports betting, it is certain that the issue will remain a point of significant discussion and debate amongst legal and political communities for years to come.